Portal  /  Site-Visit Action Plan ← Portal
FROM THE PRACTICE-INTERVIEW DEBRIEF · TARGET: SEPTEMBER 1

Site-Visit Readiness — Action Plan

Eight talking points the evaluator wants sharpened. Our representative handled every one well in the room — this plan tracks whether the portal has citable, published evidence to back each answer before the actual visit. Click any card for the full detail and step-by-step action plan.

8TALKING POINTS
2PARTIAL EVIDENCE
4GAPS
How to read this page: Each card separates how the point was handled verbally in the practice interview (it went well) from whether the portal has a published page an evaluator could be shown or cite independently. Click through for the detailed action plan behind each one.
Documented — evidence is live Partial — some evidence exists, gap remains Gap — no page exists yet
1

Admissions Criteria & Access

Gap
Evaluator's note

Admission is based on qualifications rather than gender or race, and scholarship tiers (up to full-ride) support students who can't yet access Title IV funding. Keep this answer ready.

2

Transparency of Scholarship Criteria

Gap
Evaluator's note

The evaluator's follow-up will likely be whether scholarship policies are published, transparent, and consistently applied across the whole student population.

3

Student Identity Verification

Documented
Evaluator's note

Verifying identity through passports and matching application email addresses for LMS access was a solid, specific answer — this is a Middle States requirement of affiliation. Keep it ready in that same clear, step-by-step way.

4

Retention, Persistence & Graduation-Rate Language

Partial
Evaluator's note

Describe graduation rates using our own institutional definition and timeframe, not the federal IPEDS definition, since ours may not directly translate. Be ready to explain how we track our own numbers and why.

5

Assessment-to-Action Example (Moodle → CampusOS)

Partial
Evaluator's note

The story about student complaints regarding the Moodle platform leading directly to the switch to CampusOS is exactly the assessment-results-to-action example Middle States wants. The evaluator called this out as strong evidence and encouraged multiple people — not just one representative — to be ready to share it.

6

Distinguishing UMF from Competitors

Gap
Evaluator's note

Comparing the MBA's cost and live/synchronous format to a school like the University of Florida's online program was a good start — one or two more differentiators would help.

7

Enrollment Strategy Amid Headwinds

Gap
Evaluator's note

The “demographic cliff” and international-student visa challenges are affecting enrollment nationally. The point that UMF's fully online, distance-learning model may be less exposed to these pressures was well received — keep sharpening it into a clear, confident talking point, with reassuring data where available.

8

Orientation & Support Services

Documented
Evaluator's note

The mandatory orientation course before students can begin coursework, plus the annual survey on course, professor, and administrative effectiveness, gave a great, concrete picture of student support. Keep this ready to walk through.

From the debrief: "You handled a demanding set of questions with real clarity, and it showed." This plan exists to make sure the portal backs up that same clarity with citable evidence, so the actual visit is just as strong.
Site-Visit Readiness — Action Plan · Derived from the practice-interview debrief · Target: September 1  ·  Prepared by iCyber Enterprises LLC — Your Education Consultant.